Policy development · Digital health & life sciences
Privacy & Security Policy Development for Clinical Research Organizations
Policy development for a CRO produces the specific documents a sponsor qualification audit checks by name: access control, audit trail and data retention, aligned to a 15-year record obligation most companies never encounter. The trigger is usually an upcoming RFI, a GCP inspection date, or a QA Director who has policies for trial conduct but nothing written for information security. We draft policies that sit beside your quality management system instead of duplicating it.
Reviewed by the Privacy Horizon team · Last reviewed
What you're protecting
What the policy set has to define for a CRO
A generic privacy policy template misses almost everything a sponsor auditor is actually looking for in this sector.
Access control across sponsor-mandated systems
Who can view, edit or export data in EDC, eTMF and CTMS platforms, written to apply consistently even when different sponsors mandate different tools.
Audit-trail integrity
What the organization requires of audit trails in systems that generate them automatically, and how the policy addresses the ALCOA+ expectations inspectors bring to a GCP review.
Retention aligned to the 15-year rule
A schedule that reflects Division 5's 15-year record-retention period, distinguishing trial-record retention from shorter corporate-document rules the rest of the business follows.
Key-coded data handling
Written rules for keeping coded data and any identity key separate, including who is authorized to request re-identification and under what circumstances.
Remote-monitoring conduct
Expectations for CRAs accessing site EHRs remotely, covering credential handling, session limits and what may be captured or stored outside the site's own system.
Regulatory map
Why these specific policies, and not a generic set
Each policy traces back to a specific regulatory or contractual expectation particular to trial delivery.
The 15-year retention requirement
Division 5 requires trial records to support complete and accurate reporting, interpretation and verification for 15 years, a timeframe the retention policy has to state explicitly rather than default to a standard corporate schedule.
GCP vendor qualification audits
Sponsor qualification audits flowing from Division 5's good clinical practice requirements routinely ask to see documented access-control and audit-trail policies as evidence the CRO can be trusted with trial data.
PIPEDA's policy and accountability expectations
PIPEDA expects organizations to have identifiable policies governing personal information handling, which the CRO's own commercial handling of participant data falls under.
What goes wrong
What weak or missing policies expose a CRO to
Policy gaps rarely cause an incident directly, but they turn a manageable one into a documented finding.
An access-control policy nobody can point to
When a sponsor auditor asks how access to EDC data is governed and the answer is informal practice rather than a written policy, the audit response weakens regardless of how good the actual practice is.
Retention rules that contradict the 15-year requirement
A generic corporate retention schedule that defaults trial records to a shorter period creates a direct conflict with Division 5 that an inspector will catch immediately.
No written boundary around key-coded data
Without a documented policy on handling coded data and identity keys separately, staff have no clear reference point for avoiding the mistake of sending both together.
Subcontractor terms with no organizational baseline
Without a policy setting a minimum standard, data-handling terms with central labs and ePRO vendors end up negotiated inconsistently, study by study.
Our policy development for clinical research organizations
What our policy development covers for a CRO
A tailored set of documents, not a template with the company name swapped in.
Access control policy
Written standards for provisioning, reviewing and revoking access to EDC, eTMF, CTMS and remote-monitoring accounts across the organization's systems.
Audit-trail and data-integrity policy
Documented expectations for audit-trail configuration and review, aligned to the standard inspectors and sponsor auditors both apply.
Retention and disposal policy
A schedule built around the 15-year rule for trial records, with clear treatment for the shorter-lived data categories that fall outside it.
Key-coded data handling policy
Rules governing how coded data is stored, transferred and, where authorized, re-identified, kept distinct from general data-handling policy.
Subcontractor and vendor data policy
A minimum standard for data-handling terms with central labs, ePRO vendors, translators and couriers, so every subcontractor agreement starts from the same baseline.
How the engagement runs
How policies get built with your team
We work from how your organization actually runs studies, not a generic industry template.
Step 1
Current-state review
We review existing GCP quality documents and any informal practices to see what already exists and where genuine gaps sit.
Step 2
Drafting
We draft each policy in language your teams can follow day to day, cross-referenced to the quality management system rather than duplicating it.
Step 3
Review with QA and IT
Draft policies are reviewed with your QA Director and IT lead together, so the final documents satisfy both the audit function and technical practice.
Step 4
Rollout and version control
We support rollout to staff and set up a review cycle so policies stay current as systems, sponsors and regulatory guidance change.
What it costs
What drives policy development cost for a CRO
Cost is driven by how many policies are needed, how many systems and study types they have to cover, and how much existing documentation can be built on versus written from nothing. A CRO with a mature GCP quality system usually needs less foundational work than one building its first formal information-security policy set.
Policy development is included in the Minimum Viable Privacy plan at $5,499 CAD/year, billed annually on a 12-month term, which suits an organization building its core policy set for the first time. Larger or multi-sponsor portfolios typically need a scoped engagement — get a tailored quote once we understand your systems and study mix.
Clinical Research Organizations: Policy development questions, answered
At minimum, expect to produce a documented access-control policy, an audit-trail or data-integrity policy, and a retention policy that explicitly reflects the 15-year rule. Sponsors also often ask for a subcontractor data-handling policy if central labs or ePRO vendors are part of the study.
Start from Division 5's 15-year retention requirement for trial records as the floor, then layer in any longer period a specific sponsor contract requires. Shorter corporate retention rules for non-trial records should be kept in a clearly separate section so nobody applies the wrong schedule to the wrong data.
They should cross-reference the quality management system rather than duplicate its content, so an auditor sees one coherent framework instead of two documents saying similar things differently. We typically write security and privacy policies to point to the relevant GCP procedure rather than restate it.
Language that names specific systems, specific access levels and a defined review cadence tends to satisfy both audiences, since neither wants generic assurances. A hospital privacy office additionally wants explicit language about remote-monitoring accounts, which a sponsor auditor may not ask about directly.
Set a minimum data-handling standard the organization applies to every subcontractor regardless of study, covering data transfer methods, retention and breach notification, then let individual study agreements add specifics on top of that baseline.
Yes. The policy should state separately how long the CRO retains coded data it holds directly, and clarify that the identity key's retention is governed by the site's own agreement with the sponsor, since the two rarely follow identical timelines.
More for clinical research organizations
Other services for this niche
About this service
What's Protecting Your Business from the Next Threat?
Don't wait for a breach to expose your vulnerabilities. Let Privacy Horizon secure your data, ensure compliance, and build lasting trust.