Skip to main content

New: AI Privacy Impact Assessments for teams shipping AI features. Learn about AI-PIAs

Clinical care providers

Privacy & Security for Long-Term Care & Retirement Homes

A long-term care home and a retirement home on the same campus can answer to two different regulators while both standing as named health information custodians under PHIPA. Privacy Horizon builds the privacy and security program around the nursing station, the medication cart and the family portal, so residents, substitute decision-makers and inspectors get what the law and the Residents' Bill of Rights actually require. Engagements typically start after a Ministry or RHRA inspection, a ransomware scare, or a chain acquisition that just inherited someone else's records problem.

Reviewed by the Privacy Horizon team · Last reviewed

Who this is for

We work with the administrator or executive director running a single home, the director of care answering clinical-record questions, and, at chains spanning several municipalities, the corporate privacy officer or VP of quality juggling both a Ministry of Long-Term Care relationship and an RHRA one. Homes range from a single 60-bed licensee to national operators managing dozens of campuses under one back office.

The trigger is rarely abstract. A rolling PointClickCare-class platform migration, a family complaint about a hallway camera, an IPC matter following a lost placement file, or a cyber-insurance renewal that suddenly asks pointed questions about backups each pushes a home to look for outside privacy and security help before the next inspection finds the gap first.

What makes this sector different from an outpatient clinic is that residents live inside the systems being protected. Roommates overhear conversations, visitors walk past medication carts, and a shared nursing-station terminal serves a dozen staff across three shifts, so the privacy program has to work at the pace of resident care, not around a nine-to-five office.

Close-up of doctor listening to a senior woman's heartbeat

Services

Privacy & security services for long-term care & retirement homes

Each service below is scoped for how long-term care & retirement homes actually operate — their systems, their regulators and the reviews they face.

What you hold

What a long-term care or retirement home has to protect

Residents' clinical, financial and personal lives are on record here in more detail than in almost any other care setting, and much of it sits on shared screens at the nursing station.

The eMAR and medication-pass record

Every scheduled dose, PRN administration and refusal is logged through the electronic medication administration record, building a detailed clinical and behavioural picture tied to a resident's daily routine.

interRAI LTCF assessments and the plan of care

Standardized interRAI LTCF assessments feed the plan of care and flow onward into national CIHI reporting, so the same data point can appear in a resident's chart and in a federal dataset.

SDM and POA documentation

Substitute decision-maker and power-of-attorney-for-personal-care paperwork determines who can lawfully receive updates about a resident who cannot consent directly, and it needs to be current, not assumed.

Admission and placement packages

Records arriving through Ontario Health atHome's placement process include health history, diagnoses and contact information gathered before a resident ever moves in.

Camera footage and staff phone photos

Family-installed cameras, facility CCTV and photos staff take for wound documentation or incident reports all capture identifiable residents in private moments, often without a clear retention rule attached.

Resident trust accounts

Funds a home holds on a resident's behalf mix financial recordkeeping with the same access-control questions that apply to health information.

Regulatory map

The two regulatory regimes that can apply on one campus

A long-term care home under the Fixing Long-Term Care Act and a retirement home under the Retirement Homes Act sit on different statutes and answer to different regulators, yet PHIPA names both as health information custodians.

PHIPA custodian status for both home types

Section 3(1) of PHIPA names a long-term care home and a retirement home as custodians in their own right, alongside placement co-ordinators, so the privacy duties attach to the licensee regardless of which statute licenses the building.

Read our guide →

The Ministry of Long-Term Care side

The Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021 and its regulation set out licensing and the Residents' Bill of Rights, including confidentiality of personal health information as a resident entitlement, not a courtesy.

Primary source →

The RHRA side

Retirement homes are licensed and inspected separately by the Retirement Homes Regulatory Authority, so a mixed campus can face two inspection regimes reviewing overlapping resident records.

Primary source →

Annual IPC statistics and breach reporting

Ontario Regulation 329/04 sets out what must be reported to the IPC and requires the annual statistical report due each March 1, a recurring compliance date most other sectors don't carry.

Primary source →

Placement records through Ontario Health atHome

Admission packages move through the regional placement co-ordinator before a resident arrives, raising a data-custody question about who is accountable for a file before intake is even complete.

Primary source →

What goes wrong

How long-term care and retirement homes actually get hurt

The sector's own regulatory history supplies the pattern, and congregate care's shared-workstation culture is a big part of it.

  • A file that leaves the building

    In IPC PHIPA Decision 70, an employee took prospective residents' files home and lost them, including names, diagnoses and health-card numbers, and the Commissioner faulted the home's own policies, not just the employee.

    Source →

  • Estate access disputes after death

    IPC PHIPA Decision 75 involved a deceased resident's son disputing what the home owed his family after death, a scenario that recurs whenever SDM authority ends but a family's questions don't.

  • Snooping on shared logins

    Ontario's own annual statistics point to snooping on shared credentials as the leading self-reported breach cause across the sector, which tracks directly with a nursing station where one terminal serves an entire shift.

    Source →

  • Ransomware moving through the care-supply chain

    A 2025 ransomware incident at Ontario Health atHome disrupted equipment and supply flows for home-care patients, a reminder that LTC and retirement chains lean on the same regional suppliers and pharmacy partners.

    Source →

  • Misdirected faxes and disclosures

    Records sent to the wrong physician's office or pharmacy remain a recurring, entirely preventable category in Ontario's own reporting, usually traced back to an outdated contact list rather than malice.

When organisations call us

When a home picks up the phone

Few homes build a privacy and security program on a quiet week; something specific usually starts the conversation.

  • A Ministry or RHRA inspection touching records

    An inspector asking to see audit logs or resident-record policies exposes gaps faster than any internal review, and homes often call once the inspection finding is already on paper.

  • Switching or rolling out the clinical platform

    Moving onto or between PointClickCare-class eMAR and Point of Care systems opens a window where old and new records, permissions and interfaces all need review together.

  • A chain acquisition or home transfer

    Buying or absorbing a home means inheriting its record-keeping history, its vendor contracts and whatever privacy debt came with the previous licensee.

  • A family complaint about a camera or photo

    A relative's granny-cam, a roommate's visitor capturing more than intended, or a staff photo posted without thinking each brings a policy gap into sharp focus fast.

  • Cyber-insurance renewal

    Underwriters are asking congregate-care operators sharper questions about backups, segmentation and staff training than they did a renewal cycle ago.

  • Rising ransomware activity in the health sector

    Guidance from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security describing a rising rate of health-sector ransomware pushes boards to ask what would happen if the home's own systems went down.

Long-Term Care & Retirement Homes: privacy & security questions, answered

Yes. PHIPA section 3(1) names both a long-term care home licensed under the Fixing Long-Term Care Act and a retirement home licensed under the Retirement Homes Act as health information custodians in their own right. That holds even though the two building types answer to entirely separate regulators, the Ministry of Long-Term Care and the RHRA, for everything else about how they operate.

Residents aren't visiting for an appointment; they're home. Roommates overhear conversations through a shared wall, visitors pass medication carts in the hallway, and a family member's camera can capture staff and other residents along with the person it was meant for. A privacy program here has to treat those as everyday operating conditions, not exceptional incidents.

Most residents have an appointed SDM or power of attorney for personal care, so requests for updates, records or consent decisions typically run through that person rather than the resident directly. Front-line and office staff both need a clear, current way to check who holds that authority before sharing anything, since acting on an outdated assumption is how access disputes start.

Because medication pass can't simply wait for IT. When the electronic medication administration record goes down, nursing staff need an immediate, rehearsed paper or read-only fallback so residents still receive scheduled doses on time. That makes eMAR continuity a patient-safety plan first and a technology recovery plan second.

PointClickCare, a Mississauga-based platform, anchors clinical charting, eMAR and Point of Care documentation across much of the Canadian long-term care and retirement sector. That concentration means a home's privacy and security posture is only as strong as its configuration, permissions and integrations on that one platform.

Yes. Standardized interRAI LTCF assessments don't stay inside the home's records; they flow onward into national CIHI reporting systems that track outcomes across the sector. That reporting pipeline is an obligation dental, physiotherapy or counselling practices simply don't carry, and it deserves its own line in a home's data inventory.

Start by naming who is accountable, often the administrator or director of care in a single home, or a corporate privacy lead across a chain, then document the policies already governing daily practice informally: who can access a shared terminal, how camera requests are handled, and what happens the moment a placement or discharge file goes missing.

What's Protecting Your Business from the Next Threat?

Don't wait for a breach to expose your vulnerabilities. Let Privacy Horizon secure your data, ensure compliance, and build lasting trust.

(647) 622-2644

Free, no obligation

Get a quote

Tell us what you need and we'll come back within one business day with a tailored quote.

We only use your details to respond to this request.